Issue: 346
Sent: 21-07-2009 12:45:02
In this issue:

Bank Returns to FallEmail Marketing Business Opportunity - Helen BairstowManaging People: Getting Help - 2The Easiest way to do a Client NewsletterWhy Warren Buffett won't buy a NewspaperComparing Super Fund ReturnsHow do I use ATC articles for my clients?
Return to full article list
HomeFree weekly newsletterSelf Managed Super Fund ArticlesContact usLogin

Comparing Super Fund Returns

Click here to buy - A How To Book of SMSF's by Tony Negline
Tony Negline

In late June the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority released some important research which some of its staff were to present in a paper to the "Australian Colloquium of Superannuation Researchers" which is held every year by the University of New South Wales.

The paper is titled, "Investment Performance Ranking by Superannuation Firms". Not exactly the most riveting topic you'll ever see but the information found in the paper makes very interesting reading for anyone who has some involvement in superannuation.

Many people will find the whole paper very interesting. I suspect however that most people will find Section 7 (titled "Summary and Discussion" and only a bit more than 2 pages) the most compelling.

Section 7 has an interesting proposition as to why Self Managed Super Funds have experienced such rapid growth in the recent years:

"Inability of investors to reliably compare individual funds or investment options, as we have argued in this paper, has created an information asymmetry in the market. This together with inadequate fund disclosures ... has led to a form of market failure, where given the necessary resources many investors may chose to minimize their dependence on the managed fund market. This may explain the recent rapid growth of self-managed funds to become the largest superannuation sector in Australia ... However, for the bulk of workers who have insufficient assets or other resources, the self-managed alternative is not economically justifiable and they remain captives of the institutional market."

ASIC think that you need about $200,000 in assets before SMSFs become cost-effective.

In many areas and places great strides are being made in reducing the cost of administering Self Managed Funds. No doubt some of these savings will be passed onto investors. Perhaps in time ASIC might reduce their cost effective asset level threshold.

The ASIC research will no doubt be controversial. It will be interesting to see how organizations and academics and other interested parties respond to it.

You can download a copy of the report here.


On another note the Administrative Appeals Tribunal has agreed with an ATO decision to remove a Self Managed Super Fund's tax concessions. The fund failed the In-house Assets test by loaning most of its assets to a related company and then took many years to fix the problems after the ATO asked them to correct the errors.

It is always interesting to see any Court or Tribunal case involving super funds. But this case involved a fund which was breaching the super laws and then delayed fixing them.

This is a case involving super fund trustees who for a variety of reasons appear to have not wanted to do what had to be done to keep their fund within the super laws even when asked to do so by the ATO.

It's for this reason that I don't consider this a particularly important case. What it does show is the patience the ATO display to non-compliant super funds. Will they be so kind in future? Perhaps these trustees might have faired better if they appointed enduring powers of attorney or simply shut the fund down and moved to a retail (profit or not-for-profit) super fund.

Share this article
Click to share this article on Facebook Click to share this article on Twitter

Previous article         Next article

If you liked this article and would like more by email, subscribe! It's free.

[Bold fields are required]

Your details

Your alternate email address is used only if messages to your primary email address are returned to us.


Do you work in the financial services industry?

This email is general in nature only and does not constitute or convey specific or professional advice. Legislation changes may occur quickly. Formal advice should be sought before acting in any of the areas discussed. Be aware that the information in these articles may become innaccurate with time. Responsibility is disclaimed for any inaccuracies, errors or omissions. Particular investments are neither invited nor recommended and hence this publication is not "financial product advice" as defined in Section 766B of the above legislation. All expressions of opinion by contributors are published on the basis that they are not to be regarded as expressing the official opinion of any other person or entity unless expressly stated. No responsibility for the accuracy of the opinions or information contained in the contributor's articles is accepted by any other person or entity. Copyright: This publication is copyright. If you wish to reproduce this article you require a license, which can be purchased here, to do so.

Site design by Raycon