Issue: 466
Sent: 01-02-2012 12:32:06
In this issue:

Global Economy to Return to NormalA How To Book Of Self Managed Super FundsThe Government's Super TalkfestEmail Marketing For Planners
Return to full article list
HomeFree weekly newsletterSelf Managed Super Fund ArticlesContact usLogin AllThingsConsidered.biz

The Government's Super Talkfest

Click here to buy - A How To Book of SMSF's by Tony Negline
Tony Negline

Welcome to another year.

The Government has announced yet another talk fest involving superannuation and its various announced policy changes.

It includes the higher concessional contribution threshold for those over 50 if they have less than $500,000 in super assets. I wouldn't be surprised if this change is proving difficult to put in place without an RBL type system which I'm sure the Government isn't keen to introduce.

The talk fest involves the usual people and groups it asks for feedback so what is its purpose? Cynically it'll enable someone to point to the event and claim that something is being done and industry is being asked for feed-back.

Perhaps the purpose is to address the ACTU's claims - made during the quiet Christmas holidays - that it wanted the super tax concessions to be re-weighted away from higher income earners and in favour of lower income earners.

The vast majority of lower income earners pay no - or at worst very little - personal income tax.

I'm sure I don't have any influence over Government policy but I don't recall anyone else except me pointing out that compulsory super isn't tax effective for about 50% of taxpayers. My point is not the same as the ACTU. My argument is that the tax concessions available to higher income earners need to stay because what other concessions are they entitled to? However lower income earners shouldn't be forced to save in a vehicle that taxes them more heavily than if they invested the same money in their own names.

The Government gets away with this embarrassment because the tax system is so complicated.

Already some people going to the talkfest believe that the generous Age Pension Asset Test taper rules introduced by the Howard Government should be revisited. What the savings are meant to be used for is not immediately apparent.

Just before Christmas I published a revised version of my SMSF book. You can see all the changes that have been made between Version 5.1 and 6.0 (the latest edition).

You can look at the contents page at the following link: http://www.atcbiz.com.au/r.php?r=0mjd6ne

For details of the changes made from version 5 to version 6 visit: http://www.atcbiz.com.au/r.php?r=d5xcpch

As you'll see from the list there have been many changes.

Two purchase options are available - once only subscription - $55 inc GST - or an annual subscription will gives you access to all the updates made throughout the year ($120 inc GST). The book can be purchased at the following link: http://www.atcbiz.com.au/r.php?r=5a4agqb


Share this article
Click to share this article on Facebook Click to share this article on Twitter

Previous article         Next article

 
If you liked this article and would like more by email, subscribe! It's free.

[Bold fields are required]

Your details

Your alternate email address is used only if messages to your primary email address are returned to us.

Industry

Do you work in the financial services industry?

This email is general in nature only and does not constitute or convey specific or professional advice. Legislation changes may occur quickly. Formal advice should be sought before acting in any of the areas discussed. Be aware that the information in these articles may become innaccurate with time. Responsibility is disclaimed for any inaccuracies, errors or omissions. Particular investments are neither invited nor recommended and hence this publication is not "financial product advice" as defined in Section 766B of the above legislation. All expressions of opinion by contributors are published on the basis that they are not to be regarded as expressing the official opinion of any other person or entity unless expressly stated. No responsibility for the accuracy of the opinions or information contained in the contributor's articles is accepted by any other person or entity. Copyright: This publication is copyright. If you wish to reproduce this article you require a license, which can be purchased here, to do so.

 
 
Site design by Raycon