Issue: 390
Sent: 04-05-2010 10:52:08
In this issue:

Morality and Investment BankingA How To Book Of Self Managed Super FundsThe Easiest way to do a Client NewsletterNegotiating Money Issues with KidsSuperannuation versus Resources Super TaxEmail Marketing Business Opportunity - Helen Bairstow
Return to full article list
HomeFree weekly newsletterSelf Managed Super Fund ArticlesContact usLogin AllThingsConsidered.biz

Superannuation versus Resources Super Tax

Click here to buy - A How To Book of SMSF's by Tony Negline
Tony Negline

The Henry Tax Review has come and gone.

Alan Kohler mentioned on his website the Government adopted 1.75 of the 138 recommendations and said almost nothing about all the others ideas.

As this point in time we don't know what the Coalition will do with the Henry recommendations.

The super industry seems almost universally very excited about the additional compulsory super contributions and concessions.

Personally I think it's a bit too early to be popping Champaign corks.

Some of the cost to Government for these new contributions will be funded by the new super resources tax.

As you're all aware listed mining stocks were hit fairly hard yesterday. The ASX 200 Resources index lost just over 2.6% (Monday 3 May).

Financial markets often overshoot both good and bad news so it should come as no surprise that the same will probably occur with this new super resources tax - assuming it is actually implemented.

It's important to note that this new resources tax will commence in July 2012 and SG contributions will begin to increase from July 2013. Other super changes commence from July 2012 and July 2013.

Let's assume that listed mining stocks continue to suffer lower performance because of the likely poorer earnings outlook due to the new tax for many years. Not an unreasonable assumption, I presume?

This means that the performance of any superannuation portfolio with mining stocks might also underperform and this lower performance has started now. These portfolios might also 'enjoy' lower future dividend payments.

I guess the investors who will suffer this lower performance should be grateful that in a couple of years time they might get some of these lower earnings back via the new super concessions.

All the same I'm sure glad that I'm not a super investor who yesterday needed to sell some mining stocks (or to sell a portfolio with mining stocks in it). Perhaps these sellers needed to make a lump sum benefit payment or regular pension payment.

As my children might say, "too bad, so sad".

I find it interesting that super operators are crowing about government policies which will slowly increase their funds under management over the next decade and beyond whilst saying nothing about a government policy that lowered many member's account balances today and will probably continue to have this impact for quite sometime into the future.

I've always thought that superannuation was about maximising current member's benefits. It's a trust law duty, after all.

(For the sake of disclosure my Self Managed Super Fund owns BHP Billiton shares. I personally own shares in AWE Ltd.)

You may be wondering what my thoughts about the Cooper Review's SMSF discussion paper. I'll have more to say about this tomorrow and in a forthcoming DIY Super article in The Australian.

Finally please consider purchasing a copy of my book. You can look at the contents page at the following link: http://www.atcbiz.com.au/r.php?r=0mjd6ne

The second edition has just been released.

Two options are available - once only subscription - $55 inc GST - or an annual subscription will gives you access to all the updates made throughout the year ($120 inc GST). The book can be purchased at the following link: http://www.atcbiz.com.au/r.php?r=5a4agqb


Share this article
Click to share this article on Facebook Click to share this article on Twitter

Previous article         Next article

 
If you liked this article and would like more by email, subscribe! It's free.

[Bold fields are required]

Your details

Your alternate email address is used only if messages to your primary email address are returned to us.

Industry

Do you work in the financial services industry?

This email is general in nature only and does not constitute or convey specific or professional advice. Legislation changes may occur quickly. Formal advice should be sought before acting in any of the areas discussed. Be aware that the information in these articles may become innaccurate with time. Responsibility is disclaimed for any inaccuracies, errors or omissions. Particular investments are neither invited nor recommended and hence this publication is not "financial product advice" as defined in Section 766B of the above legislation. All expressions of opinion by contributors are published on the basis that they are not to be regarded as expressing the official opinion of any other person or entity unless expressly stated. No responsibility for the accuracy of the opinions or information contained in the contributor's articles is accepted by any other person or entity. Copyright: This publication is copyright. If you wish to reproduce this article you require a license, which can be purchased here, to do so.

 
 
Site design by Raycon