Issue: 268
Sent: 23-06-2011 11:05:57
In this issue:

How Many Bananas Does ASIC Consume?John Robertson A How To Book Of Self Managed Super FundsMr Weaven's SMSF Comments
Return to full article list
HomeFree weekly newsletterSelf Managed Super Fund ArticlesContact usLogin

Mr Weaven's SMSF Comments

Click here to buy - A How To Book of SMSF's by Tony Negline
Tony Negline

You have no doubt read about Garry Weaven's comments about coming after Self Managed Super Funds once the Future of Financial Advice reforms had dealt with financial adviser commissions.

One of his gripes is that SMSFs are not subject to the same supervision as APRA regulated super funds. This is true and has been Government policy for almost 20 years. It was in October 1992 that John Dawkins announced that funds with fewer than 4 members would not receive any prudential supervision.

The rationale for excluding such funds from this type of supervision was that there would be a direct link between members and trustees and given the size limitations on super funds everyone involved could look after themselves.

In the main the close linkage between trustees and members works well. The linkage fails when fraud or theft occurs and there have been a few documented cases about this.

I personally think that APRA do a pretty good job when it comes to looking after the large super funds. But even their vigilant prudential supervision will not guard against all fraud or theft.

I hope that Mr Weaven wants to achieve more out of the FoFA reforms than merely getting rid of adviser commissions.

If this is all it achieves it will have failed. Retail financial services in Australia is based on a classic three tier distribution model of manufacturers, wholesalers and retailers. Each layer of this model contains remuneration conflicts. FoFA needs to address these conflicts.

I don't believe FoFA will stop another Storm Financial or Westpoint or other similar sagas.

Finally in relation to Mr Weaven's comments it is worth pointing out that fees in the retail super sector have been decreasing. Industry funds have been pushing their low fee model. At the same time, most people have realised that SMSFs are also a low fee model.

I don't think Industry Funds would have forced the retail super sector to reduce their fees unless SMSFs had been pushing for lower fees as well.

In this respect industry funds and SMSFs are natural bedfellows.

Finally please consider purchasing a copy of this book "A How To Book Of Self Managed Super Funds". You can look at the contents page at the following link:

The 5th edition has just been released.

For details of the changes made from version 4 to version 5 visit:

As you'll see from the list there have been many changes.

Two purchase options are available - once only subscription - $55 inc GST - or an annual subscription will gives you access to all the updates made throughout the year ($120 inc GST). The book can be purchased at the following link:

Share this article
Click to share this article on Facebook Click to share this article on Twitter

Previous article         Next article

If you liked this article and would like more by email, subscribe! It's free.

[Bold fields are required]

Your details

Your alternate email address is used only if messages to your primary email address are returned to us.


Do you work in the financial services industry?

This email is general in nature only and does not constitute or convey specific or professional advice. Legislation changes may occur quickly. Formal advice should be sought before acting in any of the areas discussed. Be aware that the information in these articles may become innaccurate with time. Responsibility is disclaimed for any inaccuracies, errors or omissions. Particular investments are neither invited nor recommended and hence this publication is not "financial product advice" as defined in Section 766B of the above legislation. All expressions of opinion by contributors are published on the basis that they are not to be regarded as expressing the official opinion of any other person or entity unless expressly stated. No responsibility for the accuracy of the opinions or information contained in the contributor's articles is accepted by any other person or entity. Copyright: This publication is copyright. If you wish to reproduce this article you require a license, which can be purchased here, to do so.

Site design by Raycon