Issue: 171
Sent: 28-07-2009 10:54:02
In this issue:

Corporate Governance: Resources Companies Say "No"Email Marketing Business Opportunity - Helen BairstowThe End of the Default Retirement Age?The Easiest way to do a Client NewsletterWhy Warren Buffett won't buy a NewspaperYoung people want Self Managed Super Funds too?
Return to full article list
HomeFree weekly newsletterSelf Managed Super Fund ArticlesContact usLogin AllThingsConsidered.biz

Young people want Self Managed Super Funds too?

Click here to buy - A How To Book of SMSF's by Tony Negline
Tony Negline

Whilst researching some consulting work for one of my clients I had to review the ATO's Self Managed Super Fund Statistical Report which has been released every quarter for about a year.

One part of the research caused me to look afresh as this data and my client has approved the release of the following information.

It has commonly been assumed that SMSFs are for the middle and older ages and higher net worth individuals but it's not true of funds being established over the last few years.

The ATO's SMSF shows the following trends:

From the "All SMSF" category

Interestingly in March '09 data 1.87% of SMSF - about 7,000 funds - had assets of more than $5 million.

In relation to the age break-down of SMSF member funds it might be tempting to argue that in the recent past a noticeable number of younger people are starting their own fund and that older investors are showing less of an inclination to use SMSFs.

In reality it's too early to reach that conclusion because it may be that many older investors set up their own fund before July 2007.

Only time will tell what the real story is but certainly a new trend may be emerging. And if that trend persists the story it tells for retail super funds should be deeply concerning.

What is striking about these numbers is the number of taxpayers with low or moderate taxable incomes who are busy setting up a SMSF. My guess is that most people would have assumed that SMSFs were a toy for the moderately well to do. But based on income you would have assume that this is not the case.

Commentators and marketers wanting to gain access to this segment of the marketplace will have to think carefully about how they talk to this predominantly lower income demographic.


Share this article
Click to share this article on Facebook Click to share this article on Twitter

Previous article         Next article

 
If you liked this article and would like more by email, subscribe! It's free.

[Bold fields are required]

Your details

Your alternate email address is used only if messages to your primary email address are returned to us.

Industry

Do you work in the financial services industry?

This email is general in nature only and does not constitute or convey specific or professional advice. Legislation changes may occur quickly. Formal advice should be sought before acting in any of the areas discussed. Be aware that the information in these articles may become innaccurate with time. Responsibility is disclaimed for any inaccuracies, errors or omissions. Particular investments are neither invited nor recommended and hence this publication is not "financial product advice" as defined in Section 766B of the above legislation. All expressions of opinion by contributors are published on the basis that they are not to be regarded as expressing the official opinion of any other person or entity unless expressly stated. No responsibility for the accuracy of the opinions or information contained in the contributor's articles is accepted by any other person or entity. Copyright: This publication is copyright. If you wish to reproduce this article you require a license, which can be purchased here, to do so.

 
 
Site design by Raycon